More Heat On Global Warming Kookery

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 21:58
This article by NASA's Roy Spencer is one of the clearest and most powerful explanations of what we don't know about global climate change. Dr. Spencer is a guy who's job relies on climate models. He doesn't reject them or have any reason to reject global warming advocacy. But he's honest enough to acknowledge that the models we have don't work.

He also expresses clearly something that I've often wondered about: In a harsh universe like ours, earth's climate sticks out as unusually pleasant. Venus is a deadly sauna. Mars is brutally cold and barren. Earth is strangely just right and, once again given how inhospitable the universe appears to be, our planet has stayed "just right" for a long time and through many cosmic changes (like variations in solar output). Why?

Computerized models of our climate have had a habit of "drifting" too warm or too cold. This because they still don't contain all of the temperature-stabilizing processes that exist in nature. In fact, for the amount of solar energy available to it, our climate seems to have a "preferred" average temperature, damping out swings beyond 1 degree or so.

I believe that, through various negative feedback mechanisms, the atmosphere "decides" how much of the available sunlight will be allowed in, how much greenhouse effect it will generate in response, and what the average temperature will be.

Finally, remember that phrase, "the Earth's greenhouse effect keeps the Earth habitably warm?" I'll bet you never heard the phrase that is, quantitatively, more accurate: "Weather processes keep the Earth habitably cool." Were it not for weather, the natural greenhouse effect would cause the surface of the Earth to average 140 degrees. Wonder why we never hear that fact stated? [emphasis added]


Once again, the end of the world could be right around the corner. But before I support returning America's economy to the Stone Age, I'll have to have some proof.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

"What Did You Call Me?"

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 13:58
Illegal immigrants and their advocates are upset by, uh, well...the English language, I guess. They object to laws and government documents that refer to "illegal aliens" as "illegal aliens." The fact that this is the proper legal designation for a non-resident in a nation without permission is irrelevant.

Leading the charge to ban the phrase is Florida state senator Frederica Wilson. "I personally find the word 'alien' offensive when applied to individuals, especially to children. An alien to me is someone from out of space."

I wonder what her phrase is for someone out of their minds?

How scary is it that this woman gets to help make laws...based on her limited vocabulary? Where is her law ordering dog breeders to drop the word "bitch" because it makes her think of her husband's ex-wife? Will she remove the phrase "handicapped" from parking legislation in deference to the differently-abled?

Meanwhile, these illegal alien/undocumented worker/alternately-citizened people are costing Florida millions of tax dollars, committing tax fraud and stealing American jobs.

What does Sen. Wilson plan to do about that? Nada.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Who Will Kill More Americans This Year? Insurgents in Iraq or Illegals Here At Home?

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 13:05
The fact that the most liberal citizen in Massachusetts knows the answer--illegal aliens--shows just how dishonest the Left is on the issue of illegal immigration.

Every time the illegal immigration issue (
a.k.a. "entrant rights") comes up, the Left concedes the facts: yes, they're breaking the law; yes, their costing taxpayers billions; yes, they contribute to violent crimes and gang violence in our cities; yes, they clog our classrooms and hospitals.

Then they drop back to the same, two arguments: 1) "You're a racist," or 2) "You're a racist and there's nothing we can do about illegal immigration, even if we wanted to."

Obviously, both these arguments are nonsense. People who support deporting illegals from Mexico, Africa, China and Ireland obviously aren't racists, unless they're what--pro-Eskimo? And there is no evidence at all that America is the one nation in the world that can't have secure borders. All you have to do is enforce the law. That's what they do right now in Mexico, Africa, China and Ireland--and nobody in America is calling THEM racists.

Meanwhile, up to 2500 Americans are murdered every year by illegal aliens in the US. This is, apparently, an acceptable price that Sen. Kennedy, Sen. McCain and Gov. Patrick believe we must pay for the "right" to immigrate to the US illegally.

But if the Left is correct, and 3,000 dead American soldiers over 4 years is too high a price to pay to transform the Middle East, then aren't that many dead American civilians every 18 months too high a price for our open borders? How can Sen. Kennedy say "We must abandon our Iraq policy" over the deaths of men who volunteed to fight, but simultaneously push for open borders while innocent Americans who oppose open borders are murdered?

I know: My mistake is trying to make sense out of the political views of Ted Kennedy.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

What Al Gore DOESN'T Want You To Know

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 09:38

...probably because he doesn't know it himself. Read the Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and then tell me that you can honestly support spending trillions of dollars and killing millions of jobs based on what we know now.

If you can, then there's one word for you: Kook.
Actually, there's something else Al Gore doesn't want you to know, and that's the fact that he consumes as much energy in a month as the average American household does in a year. And that's just at ONE of his homes.
This is limousine liberalism at its best: I'll push for legislation to kill your blue-collar job and drive up the price of your home heating oil, but I won't sacrifice even a single watt of the electricity that powers my elite lifestyle. Oh, sure--the Left believes in people making sacrifices to save the earth.
They just don't believe that THEY should be those people.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

General Petraeus's Message To The Troops

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 08:29

To the Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Civilians of Multi-National Force-Iraq:


We serve in Iraq at a critical time. The war here will soon enter its fifth year. A decisive moment approaches. Shoulder-to-shoulder with our Iraqi comrades, we will conduct a pivotal campaign to improve security for the Iraqi people. The stakes could not be higher.


Our task is crucial. Security is essential for Iraq to build its future. Only with security can the Iraqi government come to grips with the tough issues it confronts and develop the capacity to serve its citizens. The hopes of the Iraqi people and the coalition countries are with us.


The enemies of Iraq will shrink at no act, however barbaric. They will do all that they can to shake the confidence of the people and to convince the world that this effort is doomed. We must not underestimate them.


Together with our Iraqi partners, we must defeat those who oppose the new Iraq. We cannot allow mass murderers to hold the initiative. We must strike them relentlessly. We and our Iraqi partners must set the terms of the struggle, not our enemies. And together we must prevail.


The way ahead will not be easy. There will be difficult times in the months to come. But hard is not hopeless, and we must remain steadfast in our effort to help improve security for the Iraqi people. I am confident that each of you will fight with skill and courage, and that you will remain loyal to your comrades-in-arms and to the values our nations hold so dear.


In the end, Iraqis will decide the outcome of this struggle. Our task is to help them gain the time they need to save their country. To do that, many of us will live and fight alongside them.


Together we will face down the terrorirsts, insurgents, and criminals who slaughter the innocent. Success will require discipline, fortitude, and initiative — qualities that you have in abundance.I appreciate your sacrifices and those of your families. Now, more than ever, your commitment to service and your skill can make the difference between victory and defeat in a very tough mission.


It is an honor to soldier again with the members of the Multi-National Force-Iraq. I know that wherever you serve in this undertaking you will give your all. In turn, I pledge my commitment to our mission and every effort to achieve success as we help the Iraqis chart a course to a brighter future.


Godspeed to each of you and to our Iraqi comrades in this crucial endeavor.


David H. Petraeus

General, United States Army

Commanding

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Al Sharpton, You're No Strom Thurmond

by Michael Graham February 28, 2007 @ 07:42

Read my latest column in the Boston Herald here.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

What Have They Done With Our Governor?

by Michael Graham February 26, 2007 @ 08:33
Who is this man, and what has he done with our governor?

This guy--who has announced that his administration is going to actually enforce Massachusetts laws against illegal immigration--cannot be the same Deval Patrick we elected in November.
O. My. God. Halliburton got him! They've kidnapped Deval Patrick and replaced him with some kind of law-abiding, rational POD PERSON!

OUR Deval Patrick would never have admitted that state law makes it a crime to hire illegal immigrants. OUR Deval Patrick would never have agreed to enforce the law, just because it's the law.

No, the real Gov. Patrick would have announced that "illegal...er, undocumented workers" are entitled to live in Massachusetts if they want to, and in taxpayer-subsidized housing if possible. The real Governor Patrick would say "Screw the law!" Just like he did with the marriage amendment.

So, the question is, where is our governor and who is this impost...wait! This just in: Gov. Patrick wants to use tax dollars to pay for $360 vaccinations for nine-year-old girls to protect against a sexually-transmitted disease.
Whew! I was getting scared there for a moment.
UPDATE: Governor, if you're willing to pony up public money to help fight the spread of human papilloma virus among girls, how about the boys? This inexpensive procedure reduces the chance of catching AIDS by 60%. Just ask Dr. de Cock.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

They Like Us! They Really Like Us!

by Michael Graham February 23, 2007 @ 11:54
A British group has gotten together and launched ads reminding their Euroweenie neighbors just how bad a World Without An America would be.

It's a great ad, and speaking on behalf of the nation that has fed, freed and fought for more people than any other in the world (including Muslim people, by the way), it's nice to hear a "Thank You."

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

If You Were Massachusetts

by Michael Graham February 23, 2007 @ 09:00
Governor Deval Patrick has announced his latest round of tax increases because, as he repeats ad infinitum, we're facing a $1 billion deficit he "inherited" from his predecessor." We're broke, the Cadillac of Governors says, because the people and businesses of Massachusetts just aren't ponying up our fair share.

We're losing money! We're going broke! We need new taxes! H-e-e-l-l-p-p!

Really?

Actually, the people and businesses of Massachusetts have given the commonwealth more money year after year, every year, for just about forever. Since 2002, Massachusetts' government has gotten
an average yearly raise of 6.2%. At the same time, the number of citizens (i.e. "customers) has actually fallen. More money, but fewer people using state services.

In the private sector, that's called "good news." In Massachusetts, we're told it's a disaster.

The problem with numbers like this is that it's hard for the average person to understand what they mean. So try this: Imagine YOU are Massachusetts.

Let's say that you were earning $60,000 a year in 2002--slightly above the average household income for the commonwealth. If you were the state of Massachusetts with your annual 6.2% raises, your paychecks would have looked like this:

2002: $60,000

2003: $63, 720

2004: $67670

2005: $71865

2006: $76,321

2007: $81,053

How could this possibly be a fiscal crisis? Only if you're spending the money even faster than it's coming in. Only if you have ridiculous pensions for politicians, or are giving away money to illegal immigrants.

Anyone who tells you Massachusetts needs more money is simply not telling the truth. We just need less spending. But from the
$58,000 DPW worker who doesn't work; to the $200,000 cop earning overtime to watch construction workers filling in holes; to the $114,000 pension for the part-time city pol; to the $72,000 personal secretary for the governor's wife--all we are doing is spend, spend, spend.

Which is why the Cadillac of Governors must tax, tax and tax.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

9/11: What We Don't Know And When We Didn't Know It

by Michael Graham February 22, 2007 @ 15:58
If Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh gave the CIA and the 9/11 Commission a cover story--then what WERE they hiding?

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0

© 2008 Greater Media Boston

Michael Graham

Natural Truth of the Day

“We are going to cheerfully provide that loyal opposition  -- Rep. Mike Pence, R-IN 

Poll of the Day