Out of the Shadows? WHAT Shadows?

by Michael Graham May 31, 2007 @ 13:19
One of the arguments pro-amnesty folks make is that America's heartless, draconian enforcement of our immigration laws is sending terrified illegal imm...er "undocumented workers" into the shadows of society.

Do these folks sound "terrorized" to you?

"[immigration] raids netted 23 workers from Orange County, CA who were asked to leave the country. At least four of them have re-entered the United States illegally and have since written to the federal Department of Labor to claim back wages, the Los Angeles Times reported. 'We didn't come back for a gift,' one of the Orange County workers, who like the others asked not to be identified because he feared deportation, told The Times. 'We came back for what we worked for. '" [emphasis added]

That's right--they're mailing letters to the federal government, presumably with return addresses, asking for checks. After re-entering the country illegally.

Could we get these folks BACK into the shadows, please?

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Unauthorized Fun Will NOT Be Allowed!

by Michael Graham May 31, 2007 @ 12:59
First it was the city of Cambridge announcing their ban on (this is not a joke) "romping on mowed, grassy areas" by dogs in public parks.

Now the town of Holliston is threatening to throw the book at some high school seniors who pulled a brilliant and harmless prank to celebrate their upcoming graduation.

According to the MetroWest Daily News, four kids--including the class valedictorian--sneaked into the school and, using a master key, they went into Principal Mary Canty's office, moved her desk and some other belongings into a corridor, which were "left to resemble a crime scene."

In order to sneak in undetected, one of the kids figured out how to disable the school's computerized alarm system. This is described by school administrators as "hacking into the school computers."

Whatever.

The result was a great prank that harmed no one, did no damage, caused no great inconvenience and gave the kids a good laugh and a great memory from high school. What's the big deal?

The school's response is to ban the four students (who idiotically ID'd themselves at facebook.com) from participating in graduation. The valedictorian will not, therefore, be able to give a speech.

This seems a reasonable punishment for the four kids, a punishment they could have avoided if they'd kept their mouths shut until after graduation. But then again, whaddaya expect from a bunch of high school kids?

Unfortunately, the local police chief is involved, too. Holliston's own Barney Fife, Chief Thomas Lambert, has pulled his one bullet from his pocket and he's not afraid to use it.

Acknowledging that the whole incident was a prank, Chief Lambert still insists that these kids need to meet up with Mister John Law:

"I don't apologize. If you do something like this, if you go over the line, that's how we'll deal with it. ... We'll go to court."

What might Chief "Hang 'em High" Lambert charge these kids with? "...misdemeanors of breaking and entering, identity fraud (use of personal identifying information), unauthorized access to a computer system, and a felony of possession of a burglarious tool (the master key)."

That's right: Felony charges. We can't get local cops to help catch illegal immigrants, but we're going to threaten 18-year-old pranksters with five years in prison. Brilliant.

There are bad kids in the world, and their are troublemakers who could use a good smackdown, and it's possible that these kids are in that group. But I don't think so. You judge for yourself by reading a poem one of the "criminals" wrote after being caught:

Now napping and regretting what I've done,
I did not mean to deceive anyone.
To say, 'twas just a prank' is not quite fair,
More effort, thus more pain were plainly there.
While proud I stand to have accomplished such,
The penalties and trust lost are too much.
Woe be to any who would so confess,
'Yes, this is how I stole Ms. Canty's desk!"'



This kid doesn't belong in jail. He belongs in college.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Who IS This Idiot?

by Michael Graham May 30, 2007 @ 09:06
What moron said this about opponents of the McCain-Kennedy amnesty plan:

"Those determined to find fault with this bill will always be able to look at a narrow slice of it and find something they don't like. If you want to kill the bill, if you don't want to do what's right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it, you can use it to frighten people."

Oh, wait. It was George W. Bush.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

The Good Guys Win One!

by Michael Graham May 29, 2007 @ 21:16
The "good guys" in this case are the folks like the David Project, Fox 25 and the Boston Herald who were sued by the Islamic Society of Boston for telling the truth about Menino's Mosque.

The ISB strategy seemed to be "sue everyone until they shut up," a strategy I encountered when they served me with a subpoena for my phone records, emails and show prep notes.

Obviously, I ignored it, but the chilling message was sent: "Talk about the terror supporters who are part of the ISB, talk about the taxpayer money going to build our mosque, and we'll drag you into court over it."

Fortunately, the David Project is reporting:

the Islamic Society of Boston ("ISB") and its officers have withdrawn all of their claims against all of the citizens who raised concerns about the ISB, its funding and its leadership, as well as all of their claims against the Boston Herald, Fox-TV and the various journalists whose investigative pieces about the ISB in 2003 and 2004 disclosed damaging information about the ISB and its controversial land deal with the Boston Redevelopment Authority ("BRA"). The ISB and its officers have abandoned all of their claims against all of the defendants they sued 2 years ago, without payment to the ISB or to them of any money whatsoever.



This is terrific news, because it's a blow to the strategy of "silence through lawsuits" that Muslim groups such as CAIR have been using for years. Even a lawsuit that has no chance of victory--and this ISB lawsuit certainly meets that definition--is an expensive hassle, costing private businesses (like radio stations) time and money.

This time, the good guys won. Free speech prevailed. The truth about the ISB has come out.

This time.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Who Are The Illegal Immigrants?

by Michael Graham May 29, 2007 @ 12:10
When a driver fleeing the cops kills a young man in Somerville, it's a tragedy. When the driver's name is Javier Morales, a new level of "tragedy" is added: Every person reading the news story immediately wonders if Mr. Morales is an illegal immigrant.

That's a shame for all the Americans and legal residents named Morales, but they are not the victim of racism. Rather, they are the victims of a US government that has refused to enforce border security and essentially invited millions of people from Mexico and Central America to become criminals within America.

The act of violating our borders is a crime. The conduct required to remain here--fake IDs, fake Social Security numbers, false claims of a legal residence used to collect government benefits, etc--is fraudulent and criminal.

However, the Morales case (and just for the record, I have NO idea what his citizenship status is) highlight that additional level of crime that is also attendant to immigration crime.

There's a reason why the "Z-Visa" amnesty program specifically gives gang members a pathway to legal status. Would such a requirement be necessary if America had 12 million illegals from Great Britain or Belgium?

The fact is, low-skill immigrants cost America money whether they're legal or illegal. Added to that are
the specific behaviors of Hispanic immigrants--America's highest teen pregnancy rate, highest drop-out rate, etc.--and the current illegal immigrant population is not a "value-neutral" addition to American society.

When even the Bushies have to acknowledge that 20% of the current illegal immigrants have committed so many felonies and/or misdemeanors that they won't qualify for the Z-Visa program, they're acknowledging the problematic behavior of the illegals who live among us.

The point isn't that there's something wrong with being Hispanic or being from Mexico. Rather, the point is that those Mexicans and Central Americans who choose to become immigration criminals are telling us something about their overall attitudes towards the law and personal responsibility.

They're trying to tell us, but we Americans just don't have the guts to listen.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

The ACLU Picks Its Battles

by Michael Graham May 28, 2007 @ 14:34


As regular listeners to my radio show know, the city of Boston is subsidizing the construction of a mosque in the Roxbury community, giving land worth an estimated $2 million to the Islamic Society of Boston for just $175,000.


It would appear to be a case designed with the ACLU in mind--tax dollars going directly to the aid of a religious group for the construction of a house of worship. So, where's the ACLU?


Nowhere. The Massachusetts and Boston branches have been eerily silent on this entire story.


Instead, the ACLU is focusing its efforts on puling down crosses from veterans memorials like the Mt. Soledad cross in San Diego and the Sunrise Rock cross in the Mojave Desert (both pictured above).


Unlike the taxpayer-funded mosque, these quiet remembrances of veterans do not preach any specific message. They don't evangelize. They don't hand out religious tracts or (in the case of the Islamic Center of Boston) promote the teaching of supporters of suicide bombing like Yusuf Abdullah al-Qaradawi.


And yet the ACLU is suing everyone in sight over the crosses and has nothing to say about the city-subsidized mosque.


Is it hypocrisy or p.c.-inspired cowardice? In either case, the ACLU should be ashamed.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Michael, What Can I Do--UPDATE!

by Michael Graham May 25, 2007 @ 10:45
UPDATE, COURTESY OF MICHELLE MALKIN:

If you are having trouble getting through the Capitol switchboard to express your opinion about the Bush-Kennedy shamnesty, there's a special hotline number you might like to try.

1-800-882-2005. (Spanish number)
1-800-417-7666. (English number)

Freepers picked up on it this morning. Bryan Preston dialed it earlier today and captured audio of the hotline. He reports:

The hotline is paid for by something called the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and it’s being blasted to pro-open borders groups all over the country. The hotline gives its callers access to their senators that average Joes don’t have.


Meanwhile, here's the regular contact info for some local politicians.

NEW HAMPSHIRE:


Senator John Sununu
Washington, DC office
Phone: (202) 224-2841
Fax (202) 228-4131
E-mail: http://www.sununu.senate.gov

Senator Judd Greg (R-NH)
Washington, DC office
Phone: (202) 224-3324
Fax: (202) 224-4952
E-mail: http://gregg.senate.gov/sitepages/contact.cfm

Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter
Washington, DC office
Phone: (202) 225-5456
Fax: (202) 225-5822
E-mail:http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Congressman Paul Hodes, II
Washington, DC
Phone: (202) 225-5206
Fax: (202) 225-2946


MASSACHUSETTS

MICHAEL E. CAPUANO
8TH District, Democrat
1232 Longworth House Office Bldg.,
Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202)225-5111; Fax: (202) 225-9322
E-mail: Capuano@hr.housegov

WILLIAM DELAHUNT
10th District, Democrat
1317 Longworth House Office Bldg.,
Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-3111; Fax: (202) 225-5658
E-mail: William.delahunt@mail.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/delahunt/

BARNEY FRANK
4TH District
2252 Rayburn House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-5931; Fax: (202) 225-0182
E-mail: frank@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/frank/

EDWARD MARKEY
7th District, Democrat
2108 Rayburn House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-2836; Fax: (202) 225-1716
E-mail: markey@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/markey/

JIM MCGOVERN
3rd District, Democrat
430 Cannon House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-6101; Fax: (202) 225-5759
E-mail: mcgovern @hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/mcgovern/

MARTIN T. MEEHAN
5TH District, Democrat
2447 Rayburn House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-3411; TTY: (202) 225-1904; Fax: (202)226-0771
E-mail: mtmeehan@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/meehan

RICHARD E. NEAL
2ND District, Democrat
2133 Rayburn House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-5601; Fax: (202) 225-8112
E-mail: wtranghe@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/neal/

JOHN OLVER
1ST District, Democrat
1027 Longworth House Office Bldg.,
Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-5335; Fax: (202) 226-1224
E-mail: olver@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/olver

JOHN F. TIERNEY
6TH District Democrat
120 Chatham House Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20515
Tel: (202) 225-8020; Fax: (202) 225-5915
E-mail: Tierney@hr.house.gov
Internet: www.house.gov/tierney/


Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Listening To Politicians Gives Me Gas

by Michael Graham May 24, 2007 @ 14:12
Particularly when they start talking economics. The only economics they know is "I need more of your money to buy your neighbor's vote."

Alas, they're at it again, passing laws against "excessive prices" for gasoline by evil oil companies. No definition of "excessive" is ever included, of course.

Meanwhile, Ronald Bailey at Reason magazine explains the real reasons why gas prices are so high. And you'll be stunned to discover one of the major reasons is (shock!) the same politicians whining about gas prices.

For example, government subsidies of ethanol and federal targets for increased ethanol use are sending a message to oil companies NOT to build new gasoline refineries. After all, who knows how much market share will have gone to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol 10 years from now.

Ethanol has more problems than that as Bailey points out:


Every one of the six (oil industry) analysts I talked with pointed out that the federal ethanol mandate adds substantially to gasoline prices. Ethanol costs more per gallon than gasoline; it contains less energy per volume so a blend of 90 percent gas and 10 percent ethanol delivers 3 percent fewer miles per gallon; and ethanol has a higher vapor pressure which makes it even more expensive for refiners to meet EPA summertime vapor pressure maximums. The ethanol mandate also adds to costs for blending gasoline because companies now have to manage different two fuel supply chains. Lundberg notes that when California adopted its ethanol mandate, it boosted prices by 10 cents per gallon.


In fact, some research suggests that it actually takes more energy to make a gallon of ethanol than that gallon can produce. The net effect of ethanol could well be more pollution. It's certainly not energy independence.

UPDATE: If you heard my interview with Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute, his latest article on Congress's oil-price idiocy is here.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

It's A Wonderful Life In Waltham

by Michael Graham May 24, 2007 @ 09:01
I wonder how many of the good, taxpaying citizens in Waltham are aware of this fact, mentioned in passing in the Boston Globe-Democrat:


Alex Marthews, executive director of the Waltham housing organization, known as WATCH, estimates that about 40 percent of its clients are foreign born, including naturalized citizens and legal and illegal immigrants. (emphasis added)


Now, it's possible that every legal resident in Waltham has the housing they need. It's possible that there's no housing shortage in Waltham at all. Possible...but very, very doubtful.

And yet, right now, there are illegal immigrants getting taxpayer-subsidized housing while needy citizens and legal residents wait in line. Is this really what the citizens of Waltham want?

UPDATE: Oh, and if you're lucky, there's a chance that illegal immigrant getting tax-funded housing could be a gang member!

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

One Of These Things Is Not Like The Other...

by Michael Graham May 23, 2007 @ 09:19
Same story, same Pew Research poll of American Muslims, two different headlines:

Detroit News-- Survey: Muslims largely assimilated in U.S.
CBS/AP-- Poll: 26% Of Young U.S. Muslims OK Bombs

Apparently the message is "We love living in America--it's a great place to kill the infidels! Allahu Akbar!"

Hat tip: Jay Severin

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0

© 2008 Greater Media Boston

Michael Graham

Natural Truth of the Day

“We are going to cheerfully provide that loyal opposition  -- Rep. Mike Pence, R-IN 

Poll of the Day